Book Review
Guevara, Ernesto. Socialism and Man in Cuba. Translated by Helen R. Lane, Pathfinder Press, 1973.
Ernesto “Che” Guevara’s Socialism and Man in Cuba is a seminal essay that remains one of the most influential documents articulating the humanist foundations of revolutionary socialism in Latin America. Written in 1965 and addressed to Carlos Quijano, editor of the Uruguayan weekly Marcha, the essay transcends its immediate historical context to become a foundational text in socialist theory and revolutionary ethics. It offers not only a defense of the Cuban Revolution but a bold and poetic vision of the new man — a moral and political ideal forged through revolutionary practice and the conscious transformation of both society and the self.
Historical and Political Context
Composed during a critical juncture in Cuba’s post-revolutionary development, Guevara’s essay arrives after the triumph of the 1959 revolution but before his departure for Bolivia and subsequent martyrdom. In the mid-1960s, Cuba was grappling with the contradictions of decolonization, economic planning, U.S. imperial aggression, and the challenge of creating socialism not through abstract policy but through popular participation and mass consciousness. Guevara sought to distinguish the Cuban path from both the capitalist West and the Soviet bureaucratic model, and in Socialism and Man in Cuba, he staked out a vision rooted in moral transformation rather than mere economic redistribution.
Key Themes
The heart of the essay is Guevara’s concept of the hombre nuevo (“new man”), which he posits as both the goal and the engine of socialist revolution. Guevara contends that socialism cannot be built solely through material incentives or technocratic administration; rather, it must arise from the voluntary, ethical, and collective commitment of people engaged in struggle. “The individual under socialism,” he writes, “must develop in parallel with the comprehensive development of society.” The revolution, then, is not only a political transformation, but a spiritual and cultural one.
Guevara critiques the capitalist mode of production as fundamentally alienating, arguing that it reduces human beings to mere appendages of profit-seeking machinery. In contrast, socialism offers a space where individuals can develop themselves in community and through conscious political activity. Work, in this model, becomes not a means to survive but a form of social participation and self-realization. The voluntary labor brigades, so central to early Cuban socialism, are elevated here as moments of deep ideological transformation, where revolutionary consciousness is formed in action.
Another key theme is the relationship between the individual and the collective. Guevara explicitly rejects both bourgeois individualism and Stalinist coercion, advocating instead a dialectical unity between personal responsibility and collective solidarity. The task of the revolutionary vanguard — including the Communist Party — is not to dominate or dictate, but to educate and inspire. This emphasis on moral example, rather than bureaucratic control, marks Guevara’s ethics as distinctively humanist and pedagogical.
Literary and Philosophical Style
The essay is as much a work of political philosophy as it is a piece of revolutionary literature. Guevara’s prose is passionate, lyrical, and often poetic — a stark contrast to the dry rationalism that characterizes many Marxist theorists of his time. There are echoes of Marx’s early writings on alienation, Gramsci’s theory of cultural hegemony, and even Sartrean existentialism, yet Guevara synthesizes these strands into a uniquely Latin American Marxism rooted in concrete struggle.
In its insistence on moral values, voluntarism, and human dignity, Socialism and Man in Cuba shares kinship with liberation theology and anti-colonial movements across the Global South. Guevara articulates a Marxism that is not coldly economistic but infused with ethical fervor — what he once called “the great feeling of love.”
Relevance and Enduring Legacy
Half a century later, the questions Guevara raises remain profoundly relevant. In an age where neoliberalism has reduced politics to market logic and individual gain, his call for collective meaning, sacrifice, and human transformation challenges the prevailing ideology. Moreover, in light of the ecological crisis and the increasing alienation of labor under digital capitalism, Guevara’s insistence that “we must struggle every day so that this love for humanity becomes a reality” reads not as utopian, but as essential.
For contemporary socialist movements, especially in the Global South, Guevara’s vision offers both inspiration and caution. While his emphasis on voluntarism and moral transformation avoids the pitfalls of bureaucratic socialism, it can sometimes verge on idealism. Yet his refusal to separate means from ends — to insist that socialism must be made not only in policy but in the hearts of the people — is a radical and deeply necessary insight.
Conclusion
Socialism and Man in Cuba stands as one of the most passionate and visionary articulations of revolutionary ethics in the 20th century. Guevara’s belief in the possibility of forging a new human consciousness through collective struggle remains a beacon for those committed to justice, dignity, and socialism. Though anchored in the specific context of post-revolutionary Cuba, the essay transcends its moment to become a touchstone in global socialist thought.
Far from being a relic, Guevara’s Socialism and Man in Cuba continues to challenge and inspire — urging us not only to change the world but to change ourselves in the process.

Leave a comment