Literature
-

Paul O’Flynn’s Them and Us in Literature examines how literature navigates identity, power, and otherness, utilizing diverse texts. Its interdisciplinary approach combines historical, sociological, and philosophical insights. O’Flynn critiques portrayals of “the other” while encouraging critical engagement, making it a vital resource for understanding literature’s impact on societal perceptions of inclusion and exclusion.
-

The concept of the “Body Without Organs” (BwO), developed by Deleuze and Guattari, challenges traditional psychoanalysis and metaphysical thought. It represents a body stripped of structured organization, embodying unregulated potential. The BwO visualizes desire as a creative force, advocating freedom from imposed roles, encouraging new connections and identities beyond rigid frameworks.
-

John Peterson’s Colossus examines the rise and decline of US imperialism through historical and political analysis. Blending research with human insights, the book critiques American global dominance, highlighting internal and external contradictions. It invites readers to critically engage with today’s geopolitical landscape, making it essential for understanding international relations and advocating for a workers’ revolution.
-

Rosa Luxemburg’s pamphlet Reform or Revolution (1899) critiques Eduard Bernstein’s revisionism within the SPD, arguing that socialism cannot be achieved through gradual reforms. She emphasizes the necessity of revolution due to capitalism’s inherent contradictions. This work later influenced revolutionary socialism and highlighted Luxemburg’s enduring opposition to reformism and centralism within socialist movements.
-

The “History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (Bolsheviks): Short Course,” overseen by Stalin, offers a biased, simplified narrative of Bolshevik history. While it serves as a doctrinal tool that shaped Soviet ideology and political thought, it lacks academic rigor and distorts historical facts to reinforce Stalin’s regime.
-

Rosa Luxemburg’s “Reform or Revolution” critiques Eduard Bernstein’s view that socialism can be achieved through gradual reforms. She asserts that capitalism is inherently unstable and exploitative, requiring revolutionary action instead. Although reforms can improve conditions, they do not resolve capitalism’s contradictions, emphasizing the need for class struggle and systemic change.



